It was in the NY Times. It was an opinion written by Juliann Garey. The title? When Doctors Discriminate. I think I read it three times. My brain was on the repeat setting when it's normally on shuffle. I was so angry after the first pass, I read it again to double check my sensitivity meter wasn't malfunctioning. The anger thermometer was rising and after the third time, I finished the blog that I posted yesterday and knew I'd simply punctuate the point by sharing this.
Juliann Garey has an injured brain. When she needs medical attention.... never mind.... read. And if this doesn't anger you as much as it angers me, then I'm going to quadruple check my sensitivity meter. This is wrong. On every level. It's wrong.
Reprinted below, the NY Times article can be found here.
THE first time it was an ear, nose and throat
doctor. I had an emergency visit for an ear infection, which was causing a level of
pain I hadn’t experienced since giving birth. He looked at the list of drugs I
was taking for my bipolar disorder and closed my chart.
“I don’t feel comfortable prescribing anything,”
he said. “Not with everything else you’re on.” He said it was probably safe to
take Tylenol and politely but firmly indicated it was time for me to go. The
next day my eardrum ruptured and I was left with minor but permanent hearing loss.
Another time I was lying on the examining table
when a gastroenterologist I was seeing for the first time looked at my list of
drugs and shook her finger in my face. “You better get yourself together psychologically,”
she said, “or your stomach is never going to get any better.”
If you met me, you’d never know I was mentally
ill. In fact, I’ve gone through most of my adult life without anyone ever
knowing — except when I’ve had to reveal it to a doctor. And that revelation
changes everything. It wipes clean the rest of my résumé, my education, my
accomplishments, reduces me to a diagnosis.
I was surprised when, after one of these run-ins,
my psychopharmacologist said this sort of behavior was all too common. At least
14 studies have shown that patients with a serious mental illness receive worse
medical care than “normal” people. Last year the World Health Organization
called the stigma and discrimination endured by people with mental health conditions “a hidden human rights emergency.”
I never knew it until I started poking around,
but this particular kind of discriminatory doctoring has a name. It’s called
“diagnostic overshadowing.”
According to a review of studies done by the
Institute of Psychiatry at King’s College, London, it happens a lot. As a
result, people with a serious mental illness — including bipolar disorder, major depression, schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder — end up with wrong
diagnoses and are under-treated.
That is a problem, because if you are given one
of these diagnoses you probably also suffer from one or more chronic physical
conditions: though no one quite knows why, migraines, irritable bowel syndrome and mitral valve prolapse often go hand in hand
with bipolar disorder.
Less mysterious is the weight gain associated
with most of the drugs used to treat bipolar disorder and schizophrenia, which
can easily snowball into diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol and cardiovascular disease. The drugs
can also sedate you into a state of zombiedom, which can make going to the gym
— or even getting off your couch — virtually impossible.
It’s little wonder that many people with a
serious mental illness don’t seek medical attention when they need it. As a
result, many of us end up in emergency rooms — where doctors, confronted with
an endless stream of drug addicts who come to their door looking for an easy
fix — are often all too willing to equate mental illness with drug-seeking
behavior and refuse to prescribe pain medication.
I should know: a few years ago I had a persistent
migraine, and after weeks trying to get an
appointment with any of the handful of headache specialists in New York City, I broke
down and went to the E.R. My husband filled out paperwork and gave the nurse my
list of drugs. The doctors finally agreed to give me something stronger than
what my psychopharmacologist could prescribe for the pain and hooked me up to
an IV.
I lay there for hours wearing sunglasses to block
out the fluorescent light, waiting for the pain relievers to kick in. But the
headache continued. “They gave you saline and electrolytes,” my
psychopharmacologist said later. “Welcome to being bipolar.”
When I finally saw the specialist two weeks later
(during which time my symptoms included numbness and muscle weakness), she accused me of being “a
serious cocaine user” (I don’t touch the stuff) and of displaying symptoms of “la
belle indifference,” a 19th-century term for a kind of hysteria in which the
patient converts emotional symptoms into physical ones — i.e., it was all in my
head.
Indeed, given my experience over the last two
decades, I shouldn’t have been surprised by the statistics I found in the
exhaustive report “Morbidityand Mortality in People with Serious Mental Illness,” a review of
studies published in 2006 that provides an overview of recommendations and
general call to arms by the National Association of State Mental Health Program
Directors. The take-away: people who suffer from a serious mental illness and
use the public health care system die 25 years earlier than those without one.
True, suicide is a big factor, accounting for 30
to 40 percent of early deaths. But 60 percent die of preventable or treatable
conditions. First on the list is, unsurprisingly, cardiovascular disease. Two
studies showed that patients with both a mental illness and a cardiovascular condition
received about half the number of follow-up interventions, like bypass surgery
or cardiac catheterization, after having a heart
attack than did the “normal” cardiac patients.
The report also contains a list of policy
recommendations, including designating patients with serious mental illnesses
as a high-priority population; coordinating and integrating mental and physical
health care for such people; education for health care workers and patients;
and a quality-improvement process that supports increased access to physical
health care and ensures appropriate prevention, screening and treatment
services.
Such changes, if implemented, might make a real
difference. And after seven years of no change, signs of movement are popping
up, particularly among academic programs aimed at increasing awareness of
mental health issues. Several major medical schools now have programs in the
medical humanities, an emerging field that draws on diverse disciplines
including the visual arts, humanities, music and science to make medical
students think differently about their patients. And Johns Hopkins offers a
doctor of public health with a specialization in mental health.
Perhaps the most notable of these efforts — and
so far the only one of its kind — is the narrativemedicine program at Columbia University Medical Center, which starts
with the premise that there is a disconnect between health care and patients
and that health care workers need to start listening to what their patients are
telling them, and not just looking at what’s written on their charts.
According to the program’s mission statement,
“The effective practice of health care requires the ability to recognize,
absorb, interpret, and act on the stories and plights of others. Medicine
practiced with narrative competence is a model for humane and effective medical
practice.”
We can only hope that humanizing programs like
this one become a requirement for all health care workers. Maybe then “first,
do no harm” will apply to everyone, even the mentally ill.
The author of the novel “Too Bright to Hear Too
Loud to See” and a co-editor of “Voices of Bipolar Disorder: The Healing
Companion.”
Like it? Share it!
Shared to Facebook. I feel a deep sense of relief that the idea of mental illness as a biological illness is finally getting some play. I've always been mystified at those who believe that an injured brain is "all in your head."
ReplyDeleteMedical treatment is an important issue.
ReplyDeleteHowever, the first building block must be removing the stigmatizing effect of a mental health diagnosis. It allows doctors, like many in society, to 'discount' that person; see them as somehow less human than the rest of society. Healthcare has become so corporatized, doctors often have no time to listen to any patient, and so any lurking prejudice often can raise its ugly head and give the doctor a justification for moving on to their next task.
AL in the Midwest
I am a teacher at Core virtue school and this school offer character education to students which helps them in building a good character here in am teaching English subject from last eight years and I am enjoying my duty as a prayer and bestsdissertation service is there to help.
ReplyDelete